From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:34:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704290134.39048.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1177779533.7646.264.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release.
>
> Michal, thanks for stepping up !
>
> > Subject : 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177 send_IPI_mask_bitmask()
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/27/621
> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> > Status : unknown
>
> Len,
>
> clockevents_notify() is called with the power verify information for an
> offline CPU. I can handle this in the clockevents code, but I think acpi
> is the correct place.
So the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y case is broken,
but the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=n below is okay?
Not immediately clear why both cases can't fail.
Maybe Venki can explain.
-Len
static void acpi_propagate_timer_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
unsigned long reason;
reason = pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state < INT_MAX ?
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON : CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_OFF;
clockevents_notify(reason, &pr->id);
#else
cpumask_t mask = cpumask_of_cpu(pr->id);
if (pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state < INT_MAX)
on_each_cpu(switch_APIC_timer_to_ipi, &mask, 1, 1);
else
on_each_cpu(switch_ipi_to_APIC_timer, &mask, 1, 1);
#endif
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-29 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 16:27 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team) Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-28 16:52 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-28 17:18 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-28 17:52 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-28 18:19 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-04-28 21:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-04-29 1:25 ` Greg KH
2007-04-28 16:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 5:34 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-04-29 8:25 ` send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)) Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 17:06 ` 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team) Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 18:10 ` Thomas Meyer
2007-04-28 20:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 18:03 ` Thomas Meyer
2007-04-28 19:06 ` Diego Calleja
2007-04-30 21:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-30 22:35 ` Håkan Lindqvist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704290134.39048.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox