From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932500AbXD2IBX (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:01:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932659AbXD2IBX (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:01:23 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:58159 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932500AbXD2IBW (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:01:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:00:28 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Kasper Sandberg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Gene Heskett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Williams , Thomas Gleixner , caglar@pardus.org.tr, Mark Lord , Zach Carter , buddabrod Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6 Message-ID: <20070429080028.GA9988@elte.hu> References: <1177618164.14496.5.camel@localhost> <20070427115344.GA30706@elte.hu> <20070427115526.GA7699@elte.hu> <1177774551.21279.8.camel@localhost> <1177809512.9756.10.camel@localhost> <20070429053022.GB23638@1wt.eu> <20070429065900.GB32281@elte.hu> <20070429071627.GC23638@1wt.eu> <20070429073030.GA5253@elte.hu> <20070429073819.GD23638@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070429073819.GD23638@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > [...] except for Mike who has not tested recent versions. [...] > > > > actually, dont discount Mark Lord's test results either. And it > > might be a good idea for Mike to re-test SD 0.46? > > In any case, it might be a good idea because Mike encountered a > problem that nobody could reproduce. [...] actually, Mark Lord too reproduced something similar to Mike's results. Please try those workloads yourself. Ingo