Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7

["S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1199 bytes --]

29 Nis 2007 Paz tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı: 
> > [...] and there were no regression instead of my daydreams) or im too
> > tired to understand the differences.
>
> could the CPU have dropped speed for that bootup (some CPUs do that
> automatically upon overheating), or perhaps if you are using some RAID
> array, could it have done a background resync? Especially the bootup
> slowdown you saw seemed significant, and because bootup speed is 90% IO
> dominated, the CPU scheduler seems an unlikely candidate.

It could some overheating problem but i think if it is, this is the first time 
it occurs :), and i don't have any array, SAMSUNG HM120JC IDE disk works on 
SONY VAIO FS-215B.

I just boot with plain CFSv7 and boot time seems normal; 

Apr 29 15:02:54 (up 10.72) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 29 15:03:02 (up 17.26) /sbin/mudur.py boot
Apr 29 15:03:06 (up 21.34) /sbin/mudur.py default

I'll report if i can find any reproducable problem, so far CFSv7 works as 
expected :)

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]