Re: Linux 2.6.21

Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-29T21:16:56Z

On 29/04/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
> > El Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> escribió:
> >
> > > Bugzilla might not be perfect, but it works and it's better than doing
> > > it by hand.
> >
> > The good thing about the wiki is that it doesn't exclude bugzilla. It's
> > just a "regressions list", it doesn't intends to replace bugzilla. If a bug
> > doesn't gets fixed for a while, I don't think it's very useful to keep it
> > forever in the list like you do in the bugzilla, because I don't think
> > it's possible to fix every single bug, and it steals you time to fix bugs
> > that you are able to fix.
> >
> > It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8)
>
> What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki?

It's for -stable team.

I didn't saw any 2.6.22-stuff regression yet.

>
> cu
> Adrian

Regards,
Michal

--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
Kernel Monkeys
(http://kernel.wikidot.com/start)