From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423129AbXD3HnZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:43:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423130AbXD3HnZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:43:25 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:53412 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423129AbXD3HnY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:43:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:05 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Chmielewski , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Message-Id: <20070430004305.cedb2e9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070430030213.GB23336@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (various cc's reestablished. Please don't remove cc's when dealing with kernel people). On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:57:08 +0200 Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20070430030213.GB23336@stusta.de> you wrote: > > If it is considered useful it shouldn't be a problem to automatically > > forward all incoming Bugzilla bugs to linux-kernel. > > Yes, most of it to linux-kernel, some components (netdev@, architecture) to > a more specific list. > I think it would be a net good thing to send bugme-new notifications to lkml, actually. There are only maybe 5-10 per day (mad guess).