public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070430172547.204810@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301742390.2985@pentafluge.infradead.org>


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
An: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
CC: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities

> Hi Helge and others,
> 
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
> 
> >> what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
> >> vacuum at the price that the work isn't even done for months.
> >> ONLY IF there is a personnel vacuum the necessity for others to
> volunteer 
> >> will arise.
> >> 
> > A sufficiently bad maintainer will also do it.  If lots of submitters
> send
> > their patches to andrew in order to get past a dysfunctional maintainer,
> > then the subsystem effectively is unmaintained.
> 
> The point is that Uwe patch will generate regressions by breaking for 
> Twinhan. His patch just removes compilation for dst and dst_ca on Kconfig,
> without taking care or driver internals. So, two initialization functions 
> won't be called by symbol_request(). Although those two functions will be 
> undefined, as the dvb will do the linkedition at module runtume (if 
> DVB_ATTACH is selected), modprobe won't detect the lack of those
> functions.
> At the end, cards with ST chips (DST and/or DST CA) will stop working, 
> without even printing a warning.

Mister Chehab, for the first and for the utmost last time now:

My deselection patch implies a very good text to strongly discourage the use of DST
and DST_CA in case someone does not know what he or she is doing. In so far the case that "cards with ST chips (DST and/ or DST CA) will stop working" will not happen at all.
This patch IS NOT DONE TO MAKE ANY DST OR DST_CA MODULE REQUIRING CARD WORK - 
THIS IS YOUR PART OF SO-CALLED LOGIC!!!!

THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT DST AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL!!!!

Example: Pinnacle PCTV SAT!!!

And once again and for the last time:

I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during compilation, and I have been working with this almost fantastic solution with several kernels for months now!

Above that I gave you every proof one can ever give: You received dmesg, you received configs, you received proven thesis, you received everything.

It would really be a perfect solution to bomb away the almost incredible meters thick wall in front of your head and your eyes.

And at this time I will stop responding to your mails - I got enough of you!!!
It's enough!!
> 
> I've tried to explain this to Uwe several times, but, at the end, he 
> always start insulting me and/or other developers.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mauro.

Happy reflection, Mister Chehab!!!!!

-- 
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-30 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-29 18:22 Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 20:59   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 21:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 23:00       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30  0:58         ` [linux-dvb] " hermann pitton
2007-04-30 11:02           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 11:21             ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 11:50               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:04                 ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 15:24                   ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 16:09                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 16:56                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-04-30 17:25                     ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2007-04-30 18:04                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 18:07                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:14                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-30 18:29                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:29                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 19:42                         ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 11:35             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-30 11:48             ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 12:37               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 13:06                 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 14:09                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:30                     ` Michael Krufky
2007-04-30 16:39                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 14:49                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 15:19                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 22:41                       ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 22:58                         ` Manu Abraham
2007-04-30 23:08                           ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 23:40                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-01  0:19                             ` Manu Abraham
2007-05-01  0:29                               ` Markus Rechberger
2007-05-01  9:23                               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:05                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:20                           ` hermann pitton
2007-04-30  1:37   ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 10:47     ` Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070430172547.204810@gmx.net \
    --to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-dvb@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox