From: "Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070430172547.204810@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301742390.2985@pentafluge.infradead.org>
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
An: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
CC: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities
> Hi Helge and others,
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> >> what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
> >> vacuum at the price that the work isn't even done for months.
> >> ONLY IF there is a personnel vacuum the necessity for others to
> volunteer
> >> will arise.
> >>
> > A sufficiently bad maintainer will also do it. If lots of submitters
> send
> > their patches to andrew in order to get past a dysfunctional maintainer,
> > then the subsystem effectively is unmaintained.
>
> The point is that Uwe patch will generate regressions by breaking for
> Twinhan. His patch just removes compilation for dst and dst_ca on Kconfig,
> without taking care or driver internals. So, two initialization functions
> won't be called by symbol_request(). Although those two functions will be
> undefined, as the dvb will do the linkedition at module runtume (if
> DVB_ATTACH is selected), modprobe won't detect the lack of those
> functions.
> At the end, cards with ST chips (DST and/or DST CA) will stop working,
> without even printing a warning.
Mister Chehab, for the first and for the utmost last time now:
My deselection patch implies a very good text to strongly discourage the use of DST
and DST_CA in case someone does not know what he or she is doing. In so far the case that "cards with ST chips (DST and/ or DST CA) will stop working" will not happen at all.
This patch IS NOT DONE TO MAKE ANY DST OR DST_CA MODULE REQUIRING CARD WORK -
THIS IS YOUR PART OF SO-CALLED LOGIC!!!!
THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT DST AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL!!!!
Example: Pinnacle PCTV SAT!!!
And once again and for the last time:
I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during compilation, and I have been working with this almost fantastic solution with several kernels for months now!
Above that I gave you every proof one can ever give: You received dmesg, you received configs, you received proven thesis, you received everything.
It would really be a perfect solution to bomb away the almost incredible meters thick wall in front of your head and your eyes.
And at this time I will stop responding to your mails - I got enough of you!!!
It's enough!!
>
> I've tried to explain this to Uwe several times, but, at the end, he
> always start insulting me and/or other developers.
>
> Cheers,
> Mauro.
Happy reflection, Mister Chehab!!!!!
--
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-30 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-29 18:22 Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 20:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 21:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 23:00 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 0:58 ` [linux-dvb] " hermann pitton
2007-04-30 11:02 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 11:21 ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 11:50 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:04 ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 15:24 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 16:09 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 16:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-04-30 17:25 ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2007-04-30 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 18:07 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-30 18:29 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 19:42 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 11:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-30 11:48 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 12:37 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 13:06 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 14:09 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:30 ` Michael Krufky
2007-04-30 16:39 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 14:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 15:19 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 22:41 ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 22:58 ` Manu Abraham
2007-04-30 23:08 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 23:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-01 0:19 ` Manu Abraham
2007-05-01 0:29 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-05-01 9:23 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:05 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:20 ` hermann pitton
2007-04-30 1:37 ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 10:47 ` Uwe Bugla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070430172547.204810@gmx.net \
--to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-dvb@linuxtv.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox