From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753978AbXEAWYq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:24:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753643AbXEAWYp (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:24:45 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]:41771 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753525AbXEAWYp (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:24:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:24:32 -0500 From: Matt Mackall To: James Bottomley Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dynticks for voyager Message-ID: <20070501222432.GP11166@waste.org> References: <1177951131.3674.37.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177951131.3674.37.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:51AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > As usual voyager tripped over an explicit boot CPU is zero assumption in > the dynticks code. This is the fix I have queued in the voyager tree. Can we flush out all these assumptions by adding a constant offset somewhere? Or reversing the ordering? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.