From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@oracle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@oracle.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: per-thread rusage
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:17:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501231722.GV26598@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070502000458.2a7885d9@the-village.bc.nu>
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> I just so happen to think we should implement a variety of CPU resource
>> limits beyond what we now do, so this, too, interests me.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:04:58AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Agreed - and make them all 64bit while doing the cleanup. One thing
> several Unixen have we don't for 32bi boxes is a proper set of 64bit
> resource handling for memory/file etc.
> We could also start using the CPU facilities to enforce some of
> the really interesting real time process ones (like main memory
> bandwidth) that at the moment we have no control over and can lead to
> very unfair behaviour.
That would be very useful, though I'm unsure of how broad a variety of
architectures implement performance counters useful for such. Simple
caps on %cpu would be a good start in my view.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 17:29 per-thread rusage William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-04 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 18:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 0:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 1:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-01 17:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 18:39 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 20:24 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 22:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-01 22:34 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 23:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-01 23:17 ` Bill Irwin [this message]
2007-05-02 5:05 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-02 0:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-02 4:31 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-02 4:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-04-04 22:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05 4:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-10 20:10 Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070501231722.GV26598@holomorphy.com \
--to=bill.irwin@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox