From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:53:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070502065355.GB15878@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704270806230.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Apr 27 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I do believe that we could probably do something about the IO
> scheduling _too_:
>
> - break up large write requests (yeah, it will make for worse IO
> throughput, but if make it configurable, and especially with
> controllers that don't have insane overheads per command, the
> difference between 128kB requests and 16MB requests is probably not
> really even noticeable - SCSI things with large per-command overheads
> are just stupid)
>
> Generating huge requests will automatically mean that they are
> "unbreakable" from an IO scheduler perspective, so it's bad for latency
> for other reqeusts once they've started.
Overlooked this one initially... We actually don't generate huge
requests, exactly because of that. Even if the device can do large
requests (most SATA disks today can do 32meg), we default to 512kB as
the largest one that we will build due to file system requests. It's
trivial to reduce that limit, see /sys/block/<dev>/queue/max_sectors_kb.
That controls the maximum per-request size.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 7:59 [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation) Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 8:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 9:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 10:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 11:59 ` Marat Buharov
2007-04-27 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-27 13:50 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-27 12:39 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-04-27 15:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 19:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-27 19:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 20:05 ` Hua Zhong
2007-04-27 20:12 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-04-27 20:12 ` Bill Huey
2007-04-28 5:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 5:45 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 21:57 ` Bill Huey
2007-04-28 22:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-27 20:29 ` Gabriel C
2007-04-27 20:45 ` Stephen Clark
2007-04-27 20:54 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-04-28 8:45 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-27 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-03 17:38 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-03 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 6:18 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 6:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 6:57 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 7:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 7:39 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 8:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-28 8:44 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-28 20:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 21:12 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-29 20:49 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-29 21:17 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-27 15:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 15:41 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-04-27 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 16:24 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-27 19:43 ` Marko Macek
2007-04-27 18:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 19:09 ` Zan Lynx
2007-04-27 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 19:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 8:51 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-28 8:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-28 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 16:56 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-04-27 19:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 20:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-27 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 4:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 6:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 7:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-28 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 6:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-28 17:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-30 6:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-28 17:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-30 6:56 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-02 6:53 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-05-02 7:36 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070502065355.GB15878@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox