From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ 3/5] sched: implement staircase deadline cpu scheduler
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:23:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705022223.51809.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070430115014.0fff7772.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 04:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:10:39 +1100
>
> Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler policy
>
> I'll be dropping this from -mm now. I don't think we're learning anything
> more by having it in there and I generally want to get things more back
> into sync.
>
> For the record, I don't recall any problem reports arising from SD's
> presence in -mm (Except for possibly Jiri's recent "many processes end up
> in D state", but we don't have a clue what's causing that yet).
Thanks. It was a worthwhile putting it in -mm anyway because it allowed me to
shake up a lot of bugs and stabilise it. Now SD will stick around for
comparison. It also appears to me, having discussed with many people now,
that hardly anyone understands how it actually works. In summary it is an
O(1) dual array bitmap lookup based system for creating a minimal overhead
earliest eligible virtual deadline first design. I guess I never really made
that clear and now, ironically, with people quoting papers on that particular
design now I probably should have. I appreciate the code does not in any way
make it clear that that's the case because of the unique approach I used and
doesn't really do or display any calculations in the code; it is all managed
by handing out entitlements at priority intervals.
Anyway, good, bad or indifferent I intend to keep it around for comparison to
drive cfs further.
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-27 2:10 [PATCH][ 3/5] sched: implement staircase deadline cpu scheduler Con Kolivas
2007-03-27 4:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-27 5:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-30 18:50 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-02 12:23 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-05-02 15:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705022223.51809.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox