From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767151AbXEBWqS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 18:46:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767155AbXEBWqS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 18:46:18 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37517 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767151AbXEBWqQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 18:46:16 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: Why ssse3? Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:46:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton References: <46391392.4070706@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <46391392.4070706@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705030046.07152.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 May 2007 00:41:22 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Note the extra 's'. We use "sse" and "sse2", but "ssse3". I assume > it's a typo. Nope. SSE3 != SSSE3. The additional S means Supplemential. It's probably because the few changes didn't justify a SSE4 -Andi