From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [ck] [REPORT] 2.6.21.1 vs 2.6.21-sd046 vs 2.6.21-cfs-v6
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:11:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705030211.39345.a1426z@gawab.com> (raw)
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2007 18:05, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > meanwhile I've redone my numbercrunching tests with the following
> > kernels: 2.6.21.1 (mainline)
> > 2.6.21-sd046
> > 2.6.21-cfs-v6
> > running on a dualcore x86_64.
> > [I will run the same test with 2.6.21.1-cfs-v7 over the next days,
> > likely tonight]
:
:
> > However from these figures it seems as if sd does provide for the
> > fairest (as in equal share for all) scheduling among the 3 schedulers
> > tested.
>
> Looks good, thanks. Ingo's been hard at work since then and has v8 out by
> now. SD has not changed so you wouldn't need to do the whole lot of tests
> on SD again unless you don't trust some of the results.
Well, I tried cfs-v8 and it still shows some nice regressions wrt
mainline/sd. SD's nice-levels look rather solid, implying fairness.
Thanks!
--
Al
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 23:11 Al Boldi [this message]
2007-05-03 0:49 ` [ck] [REPORT] 2.6.21.1 vs 2.6.21-sd046 vs 2.6.21-cfs-v6 William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-03 3:51 ` Al Boldi
2007-05-03 4:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-03 6:42 ` Al Boldi
2007-05-03 7:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-03 8:01 ` Al Boldi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-30 8:05 Michael Gerdau
2007-05-02 12:11 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705030211.39345.a1426z@gawab.com \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox