* [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h
@ 2007-05-01 19:36 Jeff Dike
2007-05-03 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-05-01 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: LKML, uml-devel
The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for
the UML build.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
--
include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h 2007-05-01 15:31:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef __UM_CMPXCHG_H
+#define __UM_CMPXCHG_H
+
+#include "asm/arch/cmpxchg.h"
+
+#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h
2007-05-01 19:36 [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h Jeff Dike
@ 2007-05-03 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-03 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-03 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Dike; +Cc: LKML, uml-devel
On Tue, 1 May 2007 15:36:46 -0400 Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for
> the UML build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
> --
> include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h 2007-05-01 15:31:09.000000000 -0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#ifndef __UM_CMPXCHG_H
> +#define __UM_CMPXCHG_H
> +
> +#include "asm/arch/cmpxchg.h"
> +
> +#endif
OK, I clumped all three patches into one as I think that's required for
git-bisect friendliness.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h
2007-05-03 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-05-03 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-05-03 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: LKML, uml-devel
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:09:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, I clumped all three patches into one as I think that's required for
> git-bisect friendliness.
OK - I separated the i386 and x86_64 bits to make it easy to drop the
x86_64 part.
Plus, I think it doesn't make any difference - the headers behave the
same as seen from the outside, except that UML needs the uml-cmpxchg
patch in order to build. So, putting that first, then the other two
separately results in a patchset that builds at all stages, I believe.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-03 14:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-01 19:36 [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h Jeff Dike
2007-05-03 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-03 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox