Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__

WANG Cong
2007-05-02T06:28:54Z

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:53:52PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:28:18PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> > +#define __attribute_unused__ __attribute__((unused))
>>
>> Suggest __unused which is shorter and looks compiler-neutral.
>>
>
>So you would also suggest renaming __attribute_used__ and all 48 of its
>uses to __used?

I suggest. ;-p
'__attribute_unused__' is really long. I would prefer '__attribute__((unused))', since your macro doesn't let me type much less characters.