From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gmail is a bit too popular..
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:18:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070507201821.GG943@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070507145555.GG3883@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
> 2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
>
>
> The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> time to feed in... Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
>
> So far we have tried to feed all recipients in one go per
> message - that is sending 2100 RCPT TO -lines in one swoop,
> and the system has taken some 15-25 minutes per message to
> feed it to gmail. We are running the delivery 20 streams in
> parallel, so it isn't quite as bad as it sounds..
>
> I do have one thing that gmail could enable to speed up the message
> delivery (a lot!) from VGER and other list delivery sources.
> That single magic needed thing is called "PIPELINING" support
> at gmail's inbound MX servers. With suitably well behaving
> smtpserver it is really trivial to implement, all real difficult
> magic is at the sending side smtp client codes.
I suspect they behave like that on purpose to fight spam. If they
implemented pipelining, it wouldn't help them. Most probably they
can add whitelists to allow some known sources to reach them with
no slowdown. I hope someone at gmail will read and forward the
information so that gmail users can still be served when the load
increases. 12k mails in March and April are somewhat higher than
the usual 9-10k.
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-07 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-07 14:55 gmail is a bit too popular Matti Aarnio
2007-05-07 15:03 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-05-07 15:35 ` Matti Aarnio
2007-05-07 20:44 ` David Miller
2007-05-08 6:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-04 10:55 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-04 12:10 ` Matti Aarnio
2007-06-04 12:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-07 16:29 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-07 20:21 ` Martin Bligh
2007-05-07 20:18 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2007-05-07 21:19 ` Matti Aarnio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070507201821.GG943@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox