From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-mm1 hwsusp: BUG at workqueue.c:106
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:40:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508124047.GA995@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070508121232.GE1772@ff.dom.local>
On 05/08, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 08-05-2007 12:55, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 05/08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 08 May 2007 10:57:35 +0200 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> this occured in dmesg during resuming from hwsusp in 2.6.21-mm1 (captured
> >>> through netconsole). Perfectly reproducible, it simply happens each time I
> >>> try it.
> >> Let's cc Oleg.
> >>
> >>> usb_endpoint usbdev5.1_ep00: PM: resume from 0, parent usb5 still 2
> >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/kernel/workqueue.c:106!
> >>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> >>> SMP
> >>> Modules linked in: ipv6 floppy ohci1394 ieee1394 parport_pc parport usbhid
> >>> ehci_hcd pata_acpi ff_memless sr_mod cdrom
> ...
> > queue_delayed_work().
> >
> > Probably, cancel_delayed_work(&delayed_work->work) was called with the ->timer
> > pending. This is wrong, cancel_delayed_work() clears _PENDING unconditionally,
>
> Maybe I miss your point, but clearing is conditional: on timer delete...
>
> I think more suspicious is calling cancel_work_sync() for a delayed work
> (with timer pending). Or maybe some race profits from _PENDING cleared
> without locking?
Yes, of course, I meant cancel_work_sync(), sorry for the confusion.
Thanks!
So, once again, cancel_work_sync(&dwork->work) is wrong unless the timer
was stopped.
Before make-cancel_rearming_delayed_work-reliable.patch
it requires that the @work can't be re-queued.
After
works, but waits for the timer expiration in a busy-wait loop.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 8:57 2.6.21-mm1 hwsusp: BUG at workqueue.c:106 Jiri Slaby
2007-05-08 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-08 10:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-08 11:09 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-05-08 12:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-05-08 13:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-08 14:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-08 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] vmstat-use-our-own-timer-events-fix Jiri Slaby
2007-05-08 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-08 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-08 12:12 ` 2.6.21-mm1 hwsusp: BUG at workqueue.c:106 Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-08 12:40 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-05-08 10:51 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070508124047.GA995@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox