public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block:  generic_unplug_device implicitly makes irq enable
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:30:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508143019.GY4163@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070508170759.1c66352a@windmill.dev.rtsoft.ru>

On Tue, May 08 2007, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> while working on LKCD I found out common block device issue.
> LKCD uses generic_unplug_device() to finish disk IO in case of blockdev kernel core dump.
> I found out that after calling of generic_unplug_device() IRQs become implicitly enabled (it is supposed that IRQs are disabled).
> I looked at generic_unplug_device() code and found out that function lose state of irq flags, it use spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() instead of spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore():
> void generic_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
> {
> 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> 	__generic_unplug_device(q);
> 	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> }
> 
> generic_unplug_device() - is a method to unplug the block device, named unplug_fn in struct request_queue.
> I've compared generic_unplug_device() with other methods:
> file drivers/md/raid5.c ...
> static void raid5_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
> {
> 	mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
> 	raid5_conf_t *conf = mddev_to_conf(mddev);
> 	unsigned long flags;
> 
> 	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> 
> 	if (blk_remove_plug(q)) {
> 		conf->seq_flush++;
> 		raid5_activate_delayed(conf);
> 	}
> 	md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> 
> 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> 
> 	unplug_slaves(mddev);
> }
> 
> file drivers/block/umem.c ...
> static void mm_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
> {
> 	struct cardinfo *card = q->queuedata;
> 	unsigned long flags;
> 
> 	spin_lock_irqsave(&card->lock, flags);
> 	if (blk_remove_plug(q))
> 		activate(card);
> 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&card->lock, flags);
> }
> 
> As you can see raid5_unplug_device() and mm_unplug_device() are using
> spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore(), instead of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq().
> I found out that generic_unplug_device() is used not only in LKCD, so I suggest to switch generic_unplug_device() to spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() to prevent implicitly losing of IRQ flags.
> Here is patch against kernel 2.6.21.1.
> Please CC me to answers/comments.
> Thanks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
> 
>  block/ll_rw_blk.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.21.1/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21.1/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> @@ -1602,9 +1602,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__generic_unplug_device);
>   **/
>  void generic_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
>  {
> -	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
>  	__generic_unplug_device(q);
> -	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_unplug_device);

The patch is not correct, some ->request_fn() functions may sleep. So
it's illegal to call generic_unlug_device() with interrupts disabled in
the first place, which is why spin_lock_irq() is used instead of the
flags saving variant.

So it looks like you need to fix your caller instead.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2007-05-08 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-08 13:07 [PATCH] block: generic_unplug_device implicitly makes irq enable Konstantin Baydarov
2007-05-08 14:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070508143019.GY4163@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox