public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com
Subject: [PATCH] block:  generic_unplug_device implicitly makes irq enable
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:07:59 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508170759.1c66352a@windmill.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)

Hi,

while working on LKCD I found out common block device issue.
LKCD uses generic_unplug_device() to finish disk IO in case of blockdev kernel core dump.
I found out that after calling of generic_unplug_device() IRQs become implicitly enabled (it is supposed that IRQs are disabled).
I looked at generic_unplug_device() code and found out that function lose state of irq flags, it use spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() instead of spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore():
void generic_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
{
	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
	__generic_unplug_device(q);
	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}

generic_unplug_device() - is a method to unplug the block device, named unplug_fn in struct request_queue.
I've compared generic_unplug_device() with other methods:
file drivers/md/raid5.c ...
static void raid5_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
{
	mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
	raid5_conf_t *conf = mddev_to_conf(mddev);
	unsigned long flags;

	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);

	if (blk_remove_plug(q)) {
		conf->seq_flush++;
		raid5_activate_delayed(conf);
	}
	md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);

	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);

	unplug_slaves(mddev);
}

file drivers/block/umem.c ...
static void mm_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
{
	struct cardinfo *card = q->queuedata;
	unsigned long flags;

	spin_lock_irqsave(&card->lock, flags);
	if (blk_remove_plug(q))
		activate(card);
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&card->lock, flags);
}

As you can see raid5_unplug_device() and mm_unplug_device() are using
spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore(), instead of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq().
I found out that generic_unplug_device() is used not only in LKCD, so I suggest to switch generic_unplug_device() to spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() to prevent implicitly losing of IRQ flags.
Here is patch against kernel 2.6.21.1.
Please CC me to answers/comments.
Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>

 block/ll_rw_blk.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.21.1/block/ll_rw_blk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ linux-2.6.21.1/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -1602,9 +1602,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__generic_unplug_device);
  **/
 void generic_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q)
 {
-	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
 	__generic_unplug_device(q);
-	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_unplug_device);
 

             reply	other threads:[~2007-05-08 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-08 13:07 Konstantin Baydarov [this message]
2007-05-08 14:30 ` [PATCH] block: generic_unplug_device implicitly makes irq enable Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070508170759.1c66352a@windmill.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox