From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:51:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070509065122.GA5360@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464158E9.2000207@zytor.com>
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:15:21PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I believe the x86 setup tree is now finished. I will turn it into a
> "clean patchset" later this week, but I wanted to get flamed^W feedback
> on it first.
>
> The git tree is at:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-newsetup.git;a=summary
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-newsetup.git
> ...
>
> ... and a flat patch at ...
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/newsetup-36f021b5.patch
Are you planning to rebase to -linus and then let
arch/x86_64/boot/Makefile be a reference to i386/boot/Makefile?
The patch for kbuild to enable this is in -linus now.
As for the important part (the code) I have not looked.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-09 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-09 5:15 x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 6:51 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-05-09 7:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 8:11 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-10 14:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 18:38 ` Martin Mares
2007-05-11 0:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 22:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 22:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 12:21 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-12 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 22:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 22:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-11 4:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-11 23:58 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-12 0:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-13 0:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-15 20:45 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070509065122.GA5360@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox