From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762352AbXEJVea (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 17:34:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758846AbXEJVeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 17:34:23 -0400 Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.207]:32433 "HELO smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755932AbXEJVeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 17:34:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=DaXA2QmITDtNWFaWWT56x3a2Y566qHqsMaGrRxXwzK43EebDWdKWEIIhOCfbHHkyng9zXLWwZITfG4HayEHZgljIxaGAGwdwU+Zd9smWaqVA232K+Xe5CZBsmCVLxvQsgodTS9sr28QMdQovrvfjfEhoAcYPL0Vr19KkKbJzAvc= ; X-YMail-OSG: YdX3CvYVM1k6sG_lJrtfYgMyxYsykz2LBNuP7AxiDNfsNNHL From: David Brownell To: tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: drivers/mtd/devices/at91_dataflash26.c Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:34:08 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Koch?= , dwmw2@infradead.org, Andrew Victor , Linux Kernel list References: <200704271812.26392.david-b@pacbell.net> <200705101307.19794.david-b@pacbell.net> <1178831974.22481.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1178831974.22481.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705101434.08996.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 10 May 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > David, > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 13:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > On Friday 27 April 2007, David Brownell wrote: > > > On Friday 27 April 2007, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote: > > > > > > > > the m25p80 driver > > > > > was pretty close to working with those Atmel devices too ... > > > > > most of the commands are identical. > > > > > > > > Thanks for that hint, I'll have a look at the data sheet. > > > > Any progress on that? I looked again, and yes most commands > > are identical... > > > > So 340ea370c2ce89d1c15fbf785460f2f74314ce58 should be reverted. > > We look into this and fix the problem. There is no need to revert it > right now. It does no harm and we remove it with the merge into the > m25p80 driver, ok ? Sounds like a plan ... but I'd still revert ASAP. Either way, I'd hope it's all resolved before we get very far into the 2.6.22-rc series. - Dave