public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Definition of fairness (was Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:11:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070510164158.GB9173@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b647ffbd0705091224m75bf8caawa0019ecfe8bf82e7@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 281 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:24:17PM +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> One quick observation.
> 
> Isn't it important for both processes to have the same "loops_per_ms" value?

Good catch.

I have modified the testcase based on this observation (using
setitimer).

-- 
Regards,
vatsa

[-- Attachment #2: cpuhog.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1764 bytes --]

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>

volatile int time_elapsed;
int run_length  = 52; 	// in milliseconds
int sleep_length = 24;	// in milliseconds
int epoch_time = 5;	// in seconds

void alrm_handler(int signo)
{
	time_elapsed = 1;
}

main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	double prevusage = 0;
	struct itimerval timer;
	time_t prevtime;

	if (argc > 1) {
		run_length = atoi(argv[1]);
		if (argc > 2)
			sleep_length = atoi(argv[2]);
		if (argc > 3)
			epoch_time = atoi(argv[3]);
	}

	signal(SIGVTALRM, alrm_handler);
	memset(&timer, 0, sizeof(timer));

	timer.it_value.tv_sec = run_length / 1000;
	timer.it_value.tv_usec = (run_length % 1000) * 1000;

	printf ("run time = %d ms (%d sec + %d usec), sleep time = %d ms,"
		" epoch time = %d s\n", run_length, timer.it_value.tv_sec,
		timer.it_value.tv_usec, sleep_length, epoch_time);

	prevtime = time(NULL);
	while (1) {
		time_t curtime, deltatime;
		struct rusage stats;
		int rc;

		rc = setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &timer, NULL);
		if (rc < 0) {
			perror("setitimer");
			exit(1);
		}

		time_elapsed = 0;
		while (!time_elapsed)
		;

		usleep(sleep_length * 1000);

		curtime = time(NULL);
		deltatime = curtime - prevtime;
		if (deltatime >=  epoch_time) {
			double curusage, deltausage;

			getrusage(0, &stats);
			curusage = stats.ru_utime.tv_sec +
				   stats.ru_utime.tv_usec * 1e-6 +
				   stats.ru_stime.tv_sec + 
				   stats.ru_stime.tv_usec * 1e-6;

			deltausage = curusage - prevusage;
			printf ("Obtained %3.2f seconds of execution time in"
		       	      " %d elapsed seconds \n", deltausage, deltatime);
			prevtime = curtime;
			prevusage = curusage;
		}
	}
}

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-08 15:04 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11 Ingo Molnar
2007-05-09 15:46 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-05-11 11:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-09 18:02 ` Definition of fairness (was Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11) Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-09 19:24   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-05-10 16:41     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-05-09 20:24   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-10 17:13     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-10 18:55       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-10  4:22   ` David Schwartz
2007-05-10  8:51   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-05-10 20:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-10 19:54   ` Ting Yang
2007-05-10 16:59 ` [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11 Christian
2007-05-10 17:10   ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-05-10 18:51     ` Christian
2007-05-10 19:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-10 20:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-11 12:01         ` Christian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070510164158.GB9173@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox