From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tsmetana@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use boot based time for process start time and boot time in /proc
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:51:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070511125132.93a4abdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511084531.GA31854@redhat.com>
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:45:31 +0200
Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:40:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -445,12 +445,14 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> > > unsigned long jif;
> > > cputime64_t user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal;
> > > u64 sum = 0;
> > > + struct timespec boottime;
> > >
> > > user = nice = system = idle = iowait =
> > > irq = softirq = steal = cputime64_zero;
> > > - jif = - wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec;
> > > - if (wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec)
> > > - --jif;
> > > + getboottime(&boottime);
> > > + jif = boottime.tv_sec;
> > > + if (boottime.tv_nsec)
> > > + ++jif;
> > >
> >
> > Is the switch from --jif to ++jif a functional change? If so, how come?
>
> Yes, I'm afraid it was.
>
> -----------------------
> From: Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:34:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Lower the boot time to seconds, not ceil
>
> Restores the original behaviour of boot time calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Tomas Smetana <tsmetana@redhat.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/proc_misc.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_misc.c b/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
> index d84956c..60b6210 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
> @@ -452,8 +452,6 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> irq = softirq = steal = cputime64_zero;
> getboottime(&boottime);
> jif = boottime.tv_sec;
> - if (boottime.tv_nsec)
> - ++jif;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> int j;
So we've gone from --jif to ++jif to no change at all.
Are you sure that this net removal of --jif is correct?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 15:03 Broken process startup times after suspend (regression) Tomas Janousek
2007-05-03 19:59 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 16:13 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-04 18:18 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 19:09 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Introduce boot based time Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Use boot based time for process start time and boot time in /proc Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 18:44 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 8:45 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-11 19:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-11 23:37 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-11 8:46 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Use boot based time for uptime " Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 18:47 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 18:42 ` [PATCH] Introduce boot based time john stultz
2007-05-10 19:48 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-05-10 20:00 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 20:02 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 22:22 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-05-10 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070511125132.93a4abdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tjanouse@redhat.com \
--cc=tsmetana@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox