From: Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tsmetana@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use boot based time for process start time and boot time in /proc
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 01:37:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070511233701.GA13437@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511125132.93a4abdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:51:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:45:31 +0200
> Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:40:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > @@ -445,12 +445,14 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> > > > unsigned long jif;
> > > > cputime64_t user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal;
> > > > u64 sum = 0;
> > > > + struct timespec boottime;
> > > >
> > > > user = nice = system = idle = iowait =
> > > > irq = softirq = steal = cputime64_zero;
> > > > - jif = - wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec;
> > > > - if (wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec)
> > > > - --jif;
> > > > + getboottime(&boottime);
> > > > + jif = boottime.tv_sec;
> > > > + if (boottime.tv_nsec)
> > > > + ++jif;
> > > >
> > >
> > getboottime(&boottime);
> > jif = boottime.tv_sec;
> > - if (boottime.tv_nsec)
> > - ++jif;
> >
> So we've gone from --jif to ++jif to no change at all.
>
> Are you sure that this net removal of --jif is correct?
Yes.
Let's say wall_to_monotonic = { -10, 500000 } (which is { -9, -500000 }, and
the original code would result in - (- 10) - 1 == 9).
The getboottime calls set_normalized_timespec on { - (-10), - (500000) } which
results to { 10 - 1, - 500000 + 1000000 } = { 9, 500000 }.
tv_sec == 9 => correct.
--
TJ. (Brno, CZ), BaseOS, Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 15:03 Broken process startup times after suspend (regression) Tomas Janousek
2007-05-03 19:59 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 16:13 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-04 18:18 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 19:09 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Introduce boot based time Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Use boot based time for process start time and boot time in /proc Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 18:44 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 8:45 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-11 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 23:37 ` Tomas Janousek [this message]
2007-05-11 8:46 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 17:10 ` [PATCH] Use boot based time for uptime " Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 18:47 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 18:42 ` [PATCH] Introduce boot based time john stultz
2007-05-10 19:48 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-05-10 20:00 ` Tomas Janousek
2007-05-10 20:02 ` john stultz
2007-05-10 22:22 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-05-10 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070511233701.GA13437@redhat.com \
--to=tjanouse@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tsmetana@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox