From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:33:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070512013300.GA27172@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511113915.267bcc66.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:57:50 -0700
> clameter@sgi.com wrote:
>
> > > I'll take a look at tidying up the PMB slab, getting rid of the dtor
> > > shouldn't be terribly painful. I simply opted to do the list management
> > > there since others were doing it for the PGD slab cache at the time that
> > > was written.
> >
> > And here's the bit for dropping pmb_cache_dtor(), moving the list
> > management up to pmb_alloc() and pmb_free().
> >
> > With this applied, we're all set for killing off slab destructors
> > from the kernel entirely.
>
> hm, this is already in Paul's git tree.
>
> If we're going to slam all this into 2.6.22 then I can just tempdrop Paul's
> tree.
>
> However I think we've done enough slab work for 2.6.22 now so I'm inclined
> to queue these changes for 2.6.23. That would mean that the slab changes in
> -mm have a dependency on the sh git tree which I am sure to forget about.
> If I end up merging these changes before Paul merges his tree, sh will
> break. Presumably Paul will notice this ;)
I can prune it from my tree if you'd rather just bundle these together, I
wasn't sure what the timeline for these changes were, so I opted just to
toss the PMB rework in my git tree ahead of time.
On the other hand, if Christoph's changes are going to be queued for
2.6.23, the PMB changes will trickle in well before then anyways.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 16:57 [patch 0/2] Remove destructor support from slab allocators clameter
2007-05-11 16:57 ` [patch 1/2] From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> clameter
2007-05-11 18:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 0:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-12 1:33 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-05-12 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 16:57 ` [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors clameter
2007-05-11 17:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-12 1:33 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070512013300.GA27172@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox