From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 03:07:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070512030754.90488f79.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178961489.22481.133.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:18:09 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > It's peculiar that the hang happens when acpi_evaluate_object() hits its
> > return statement. Any theories there?
>
> Only stack or memory corruption come into mind, but I have no clue how
> this is related to the resume logic changes.
So I had the brilliant idea of turning on some kernel debugging. It's
a shame that CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND disables CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
[ 73.533454] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created
[ 73.550429] Stopping tasks ... BUG: at kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags()
[ 73.550988] [<c0104c14>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[ 73.551143] [<c0105769>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[ 73.551279] [<c01057c1>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
[ 73.551412] [<c0132732>] check_flags+0x93/0x13d
[ 73.551554] [<c0135558>] lock_acquire+0x28/0x7f
[ 73.551691] [<c0310e35>] _spin_lock+0x2b/0x38
[ 73.551827] [<c013dc43>] refrigerator+0x16/0xc7
[ 73.551965] [<c0125d2e>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x32/0x387
[ 73.552124] [<c010336d>] do_notify_resume+0x91/0x6a9
[ 73.552271] [<c0103df1>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1a
[ 73.552413] =======================
[ 73.552507] irq event stamp: 3075
[ 73.552595] hardirqs last enabled at (3075): [<c0103e51>] syscall_exit_work+0x11/0x26
[ 73.552821] hardirqs last disabled at (3074): [<c0103d35>] syscall_exit+0x9/0x1a
[ 73.553046] softirqs last enabled at (2778): [<c01209f2>] __do_softirq+0x92/0x9a
[ 73.553255] softirqs last disabled at (2693): [<c0120a27>] do_softirq+0x2d/0x46
[ 73.559504] done.
[ 73.559569] Shrinking memory... \b-\bdone (0 pages freed)
[ 73.646511] Freed 0 kbytes in 0.08 seconds (0.00 MB/s)
[ 73.649595] platform sonypi: freeze
[ 73.649707] platform bluetooth: freeze
[ 73.649817] usb_endpoint usbdev5.1_ep81: PM: suspend 0->1, parent 5-0:1.0 already 2
[ 73.650023] hub 5-0:1.0: PM: suspend 2-->1
<snippage>
[ 73.739499] ipw2200 0000:06:0b.0: freeze
[ 73.743860] eth1: Going into suspend...
[ 73.748444] e100 0000:06:08.0: freeze
at this point I lost netconsole (earlier testing was without netconsole
btw)
The lockdep spew is coming out of here:
static void check_flags(unsigned long flags)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP) && defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
if (!debug_locks)
return;
if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
--> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled);
else
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!current->hardirqs_enabled);
and the callsite is:
void refrigerator(void)
{
/* Hmm, should we be allowed to suspend when there are realtime
processes around? */
long save;
--> task_lock(current);
if (freezing(current)) {
frozen_process();
task_unlock(current);
} else {
I don't really know what lockdep is complaining about there. I assume I'm
not supposed to, given that whoever wrote that couldn't be bothered
documenting any of it.
I _think_ it means that lockdep believes that local irqs are enabled
(according to its state tracking), only it turns out that they're not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070430102837.748238000@linutronix.de>
2007-05-02 0:33 ` [patch 0/3] Clocksource / clockevent updates Andrew Morton
2007-05-02 6:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-02 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20070430102852.042964000@linutronix.de>
2007-05-05 7:34 ` [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic Andrew Morton
2007-05-05 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-06 15:03 ` [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-08 10:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 5:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 7:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 8:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 8:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 8:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 13:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 17:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-10 8:46 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-10 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 9:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-10 20:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-11 16:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-11 20:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-11 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-12 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 8:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 9:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 10:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-12 11:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 16:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 17:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 17:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-13 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-13 8:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-13 16:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-13 19:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-13 20:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-13 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-12 11:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-15 16:52 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-13 16:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-14 6:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 6:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-09 12:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-09 17:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20070430102851.987296000@linutronix.de>
2007-05-07 6:43 ` [patch 2/3] ACPI: Keep TSC stable, when lapic_timer_c2_ok is set Andrew Morton
2007-05-07 7:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070512030754.90488f79.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox