linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxpps@ml.enneenne.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 00:08:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070512070851.GA18752@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511231711.21b8a334.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:17:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 23:55:37 +0200
> Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > here my new patch with a lot of fixes.
> > 
> > The only issue not still fixed is the one related with:
> > 
> > 	#define NETLINK_PPSAPI          20
> > 
> > I need time to resolve it.
> > 
> > Follows my comments and then the patch, hope now I can came back into
> > -mm tree again! :)
> 
> Well I suppose I could toss it in there for a bit of review-and-test.  But
> I'll need to drop it again because we do need to split this patch into the series
> of patches, please.
> 
> You should do this earlier rather than later because it improves reviewability.
> 
> > > - This:
> > > 
> > > 	static void pps_class_release(struct class_device *cdev)
> > > 	{
> > > 		/* Nop??? */
> > > 	}
> > > 
> > >   is a bug and it earns you a nastygram from Greg.  These objects must be
> > >   dynamically allocated - this is not optional.
> > 
> > It could be acceptable defining this function as void?
> 
> No, it needs to be a proper release function, like all the other ones
> around the place.
> 
> This comes up again and again and again and I recently asked Greg to direct
> me to (or to write) suitable documentation, and I think he did, but I lost
> it.  Greg, can you remind us please?

I need to put it in some permanent place, but basically the problem is
that if you need to shut the kernel up by using an empty function for a
release, then you are not understanding why the kernel was trying to
warn you in the first place :(

You need to free your memory for the class_device in the release
function, you can not have a static structure, or rely on some other
reference count to handle the cleanup properly.

Also note that 'struct class_device' is going away and you should use
'struct device' instead.  That too needs to be documented better, and is
on my list of things to do...

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-12  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-21  7:41 [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-21  8:05 ` Jon K Hellan
2007-03-21  8:08   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-21 15:34   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-21 16:55 ` [LinuxPPS] " Reg Clemens
2007-03-21 20:36   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-21 22:35     ` Reg Clemens
2007-04-26 21:01       ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-02 19:33 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-02 21:06   ` john stultz
2007-05-03 10:03     ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-10  7:27   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10  9:48     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 10:58     ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-10 11:01       ` David Miller
2007-05-10 11:45         ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-10 11:51           ` David Miller
2007-05-10 11:54             ` David Miller
2007-05-11  0:30         ` Info about the new netlink layer userland API Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-12  5:59     ` [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-12  6:17       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12  7:08         ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-16 18:52 Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-16 19:12 ` Russell King
2007-02-16 20:43   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-16 20:51     ` Russell King
2007-02-16 21:03       ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-16 19:56 ` Jan Dittmer
2007-02-16 20:57   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-16 21:19     ` Jan Dittmer
2007-02-20  2:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-21 12:04   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-21 16:14     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-22  8:51       ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-21 23:51     ` Roman Zippel
2007-02-22  9:00       ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-02-21 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-22  9:59   ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-13 21:38 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-13 22:48   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14  9:31     ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-14 13:19       ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 14:06         ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-14 14:12           ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 14:27             ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-14 14:42               ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 14:52                 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-14 15:37                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 15:47                     ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-14 20:57                       ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-15 10:29                         ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-03-15 15:18                           ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-15 15:37                             ` Rodolfo Giometti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070512070851.GA18752@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxpps@ml.enneenne.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).