From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758015AbXELKKb (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:10:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755564AbXELKKZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:10:25 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:23513 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755556AbXELKKY (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:10:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=W050WFG8QWYVgMYMuK+8oMzgfHn8wP/tSHJ8wh8SrT22zlPxJWp5UI/NBbLY0jlzv+B61z7wqnqkhDg9exo6qKjRz8MWjE7SYy/1uOm1IKsz5oTcODDJfy/sFedDXjFkfBYTKnmzkJXpdCqVQODTyoGz6XVA2cEK7+/f05juJdE= Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:09:49 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Christoph Hellwig , Cyrill Gorcunov , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ben Fennema , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data Message-ID: <20070512100949.GC8337@cvg> References: <20070510140000.GA12399@cvg> <20070510154640.c0299a52.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070511072939.GA25727@infradead.org> <20070511090127.GD9444@cvg> <20070511103956.GA30896@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070511103956.GA30896@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph, you know I've got a question (may be it's stupid) - what a sense to discard UDF_I_* macroses? I mean as I see they don't slow down execution of the code... Cyrill