public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>, Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1: Broken suspend on SMP with tifm
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 00:08:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070513200845.GA3078@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705132132.08546.rjw@sisk.pl>

On 05/13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> The suspend/hibernation is broken on SMP due to:
> 
> commit 3540af8ffddcdbc7573451ac0b5cd57a2eaf8af5
> tifm: replace per-adapter kthread with freezeable workqueue
> 
> Well, it looks like freezable worqueues still deadlock with CPU hotplug
> when worker threads are frozen.

Ugh. I thought we deprecated create_freezeable_workqueue(), exactly
because suspend was changed to call _cpu_down() after freeze().

It is not that "looks like freezable worqueues still deadlock", it
is "of course, freezable worqueues deadlocks" on CPU_DEAD.

The ->freezeable is still here just because of incoming "cpu-hotplug
using freezer" rework.

No?

> --- linux-2.6.22-rc1.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -799,9 +799,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callb
>  	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  
> -	action &= ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN;
> -
> -	switch (action) {
> +	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {

Confused. How can we see, say CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN, if we cleared
CPU_TASKS_FROZEN bit?

>  	case CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE:
>  		mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex);
>  		return NOTIFY_OK;
> @@ -819,20 +817,29 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callb
>  
>  		switch (action) {
>  		case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> +		case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
>  			if (!create_workqueue_thread(cwq, cpu))
>  				break;
>  			printk(KERN_ERR "workqueue for %i failed\n", cpu);
>  			return NOTIFY_BAD;
>  
>  		case CPU_ONLINE:
> +		case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
>  			start_workqueue_thread(cwq, cpu);
>  			break;
>  
>  		case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> +		case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
>  			start_workqueue_thread(cwq, -1);
>  		case CPU_DEAD:
>  			cleanup_workqueue_thread(cwq, cpu);
>  			break;
> +
> +		case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
> +			if (wq->freezeable)
> +				thaw_process(cwq->thread);
> +			cleanup_workqueue_thread(cwq, cpu);
> +			break;
>  		}
>  	}

Minor, but can't we do

		...
		case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
		case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
			start_workqueue_thread(cwq, -1);
		case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
			if (wq->freezeable)
				// we can't see PF_FROZEN if it was CPU_UP_CANCELED
				thaw_process(cwq->thread);
		case CPU_DEAD:
			cleanup_workqueue_thread(cwq, cpu);
			break;

?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-13 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-13 19:32 2.6.22-rc1: Broken suspend on SMP with tifm Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 20:08 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-05-13 20:30   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-13 20:50     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 20:50       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-13 21:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 21:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-13 21:50             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 21:54               ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-13 22:21                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 22:32                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-14  3:24                     ` Alex Dubov
2007-05-14  5:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-14 16:55               ` Freezeable workqueues [Was: 2.6.22-rc1: Broken suspend on SMP with tifm] Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-14 21:27                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-14 21:48                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-15  0:56                     ` Alex Dubov
2007-05-15 20:54                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-15 20:54                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-20 19:54                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-20 20:48                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-20 21:06                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-20 21:49                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 20:33   ` 2.6.22-rc1: Broken suspend on SMP with tifm Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-13 21:52 ` [PATCH] for 2.6.22, make freezeable workqueues singlethread Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070513200845.GA3078@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox