Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14T20:49:04Z

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Confused. This patch conflicts a lot with James's one (which I named
> voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch).
>
> If your "i386: move common parts of smp into their own file" also fixes
> Voyager and is preferred then cool, but a) the changelog should tell us
> that and b) could James please test it?
>

The first version of the patch did both, which I guess is the one you've
got. The one I just sent has no Voyager pieces, and has a
Voyager-specific companion patch, which is the basis of the one that
James posted (with pieces of this patch pasted into it).

J