From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758898AbXENUJx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 16:09:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754760AbXENUJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 16:09:43 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50659 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754259AbXENUJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 16:09:42 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:09:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" References: <1179158912.3703.47.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <1179163348.3703.57.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4648B28A.5000800@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <4648B28A.5000800@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705142209.05676.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 May 2007 21:03, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > No, I'm proposing this for 2.6.22-rc1 ... Andi has already said he won't > > push the smp consolidation patch for 2.6.22. > > > > Without this patch, voyager won't even build, since the smp_ops broke > > it, so it needs to be fixed *now*. > > Sure, I suppose. But given that the patch which fixes this is a simple > no-functional-changes code-motion patch, it seems odd to not use it in > favour of putting in a big chunk of duplicated code. Ok. If it's just the code movement patch that's needed perhaps it's better to use that. -Andi