From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, garyhade@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:50:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070517005016.GA25935@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464B3505.20004@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This patch is against the current libata-dev#upstream +
> pata_scc-fix-build-failure[1].
>
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/528405
>
> Paul, please verify this fixes your problem. You can skip the
> pata_scc patch, it will cause pata_scc part to be rejected but doesn't
> matter.
>
Yes, this does get iVDR detection working again. The only problem seems
to be that every now and then I end up with this:
scsi0 : sata_sil
scsi1 : sata_sil
ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xfd000280 ctl 0xfd00028a bmdma 0xfd000200 irq 0
ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xfd0002c0 ctl 0xfd0002ca bmdma 0xfd000208 irq 0
ata1: device not ready (errno=-19), forcing hardreset
ata1: COMRESET failed (errno=-19)
ata1: reset failed (errno=-19), retrying in 9 secs
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
So at least the drive detection works, but it would be nice not to
trigger this 9-second retry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 7:20 libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 11:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 12:46 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 13:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-11 0:52 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-11 9:39 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-12 3:49 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 0:30 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 16:44 ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Tejun Heo
2007-05-17 0:50 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-05-17 0:59 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-19 15:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 9:50 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 13:26 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:35 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 16:39 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:43 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:33 ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 9:54 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 14:27 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:47 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-21 6:02 ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Paul Mundt
2007-05-29 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29 7:33 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070517005016.GA25935@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).