public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: Standalone swap prefetch patch for mainline
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:20:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705171920.13333.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4649C789.6050305@wasp.net.au>

On Wednesday 16 May 2007 00:45, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I've had a few requests for a standalone patch implementing swap prefetch
> > for mainline.
> >
> > Here is a patch that is a current rollup that should apply and work for
> > vanilla 2.6.21 (ie not a -ck kernel):
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/swap-prefetch/2.6.21-swap_prefetch-38.patch
>
> Heh.. 20 mins after I finished scraping the relevant bits from -ck1 and
> patching my kernel this arrives!
>
> <WARNING - Fanboy rant ahead>
>
> I don't normally get/take the time to pass personal comment, but I have to
> say Con I've just taken a 2.6.21 kernel, applied your 0.48 SD scheduler and
> swap-prefetch from -ck1 (needed to separate them out so I could also apply
> suspend2) and it's like I've bought a new machine.
>
> I'm running on a tiny Vaio with a 4800RPM 1.8" drive, so it's not fast by
> any stretch of the imagination. But the combination of SD and swap-prefetch
> has given it a new lease on life completely.
>
> Really, you have done a great job with SD. I was so impressed I built a new
> kernel for my Core Duo Mac Mini with the full 2.6.21-ck1 patchset. I wish
> I'd tried it years ago!
>
> This also prompted me to have a play with CFS, but for my desktop workload
> on either machine, SD just "felt" better (for whatever that may be worth).
>
> +1 for SD
> +1 for swap-prefetch

Great! Thanks for the feedback. I'm pleased that people don't just naturally 
assume CFS will be better and are still willing to test SD. I'm even more 
pleased that you're finding it better than CFS too :)

-- 
-ck

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-14  2:10 Standalone swap prefetch patch for mainline Con Kolivas
2007-05-14  2:17 ` Swap prefetch tester Con Kolivas
2007-05-15 20:04   ` [ck] " Kacper Wysocki
2007-05-17  9:26     ` Con Kolivas
2007-05-15 14:45 ` Standalone swap prefetch patch for mainline Brad Campbell
2007-05-15 15:18   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2007-05-15 15:47     ` Brad Campbell
2007-05-15 16:13       ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2007-05-17  9:20   ` Con Kolivas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705171920.13333.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=brad@wasp.net.au \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox