public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:22:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070519162239.1bcb03d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070519230537.GI6291@stusta.de>

On Sun, 20 May 2007 01:05:37 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:

> Look for example at the last one in drivers/input/mouse/Kconfig:
> 
> config MOUSE_ATARI
>         tristate "Atari mouse"
>         depends on ATARI
>         select ATARI_KBD_CORE
> 
> This is perfectly correct (the select'ed symbol is only unavailable when 
> the dependency can't be fulfilled), and all things to "fix" the warning 
> will make it worse.

If ATARI is unset then we shouldn't be generating the "'select' used by
config symbol 'KEYBOARD_ATARI' refers to undefined symbol 'ATARI_KBD_CORE'"
warnings, should we?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-19 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 15:15 RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus? Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-19 18:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-19 22:17   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 22:49     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:09       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:17         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:25           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:36             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:41               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:51                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:02                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:48               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:55                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  0:13                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:19                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  9:52                       ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 10:58                         ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:23                           ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 11:44                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 19:57                               ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 20:12                                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 20:41                                   ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-22 15:13                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 18:30                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:46       ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20  0:53         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  1:04           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  8:31             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:38               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 11:47                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:57                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 13:09                     ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 13:50                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 14:39                         ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 14:53                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:03                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:13                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:38                                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:46                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:54                                     ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:59                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 18:23                       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:05   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:17     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:21       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:29         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:32           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:23       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:22     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-20  0:02       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:11         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  9:43         ` Russell King
2007-05-20  9:40       ` Russell King
2007-05-20 10:17         ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-20 11:07         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-21  0:25 ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070519162239.1bcb03d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox