Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?

Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22T17:59:17Z

On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> >> When I said "The standard and maintainable way (for drivers at least)
> >> is..." I didn't mean the example expression, I meant the *direction* in
> >> which the example was stating dependencies.
> >
> > In that case I wish "the points" you make on threads are relevant to them.
>
> My initial reply was on a patch which removed the A-to-B declaration of
> dependency.

And if you think you can have the "direction of declaration of
dependencies" the way you like it, and also (1) preserve current
"select"-like behaviour, (2) introduce no build issues, and (3) get rid of
the bogus warnings, then: Patches are welcome. (No, suggestions that
don't work, or not fully applicable to the case at hand in this thread will
NOT do).