From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 07:28:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070520062816.GA4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0705192316s2682807chd23df6f4de29edcb@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> issues are ironed out.
Hold it. The real question here is which logics do we want there.
IOW, and how many device nodes do we want to appear and _when_ do
we want them to appear?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-20 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-19 18:33 bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image Ray Lee
2007-05-19 19:17 ` Andrey Borzenkov
[not found] ` <200705200124.13026.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
2007-05-20 4:45 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 6:16 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 6:28 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-05-20 6:58 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 14:52 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 15:26 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:22 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:54 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:02 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:23 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-05-20 16:10 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:16 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:29 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 19:53 ` Michael Mauch
2007-05-21 16:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 16:27 ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:35 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 16:37 ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:50 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 17:11 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-21 17:51 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-21 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 20:48 ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 21:20 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22 0:10 ` Al Viro
2007-05-22 0:13 ` Al Viro
2007-05-20 16:09 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:14 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 20:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-22 21:35 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 6:08 ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 6:40 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 7:59 ` Uwe Bugla
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-19 13:53 Uwe Bugla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070520062816.GA4095@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox