public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>, Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:52:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705201652.00503.uwe.bugla@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705201058.38117.arvidjaar@mail.ru>

Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie:
> On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> > > feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> > > issues are ironed out.
> >
> > Hold it.  The real question here is which logics do we want there.
> > IOW, and how many device nodes do we want to appear and _when_ do
> > we want them to appear?
>
> of course we'd like to use exactly as many (or few) nodes as are in use
> right now and without fixed limit for their number; which implies that
> nodes should appear and go on as needed basis.
>
> But right now there is no kernel mechanism that user level program could
> use to request allocation of new loop node. I won't discuss whether it is
> legitimate to mandate new version of util-linux for kernel 2.6.22; but it
> is obvious that any kernel patch that adds such mechanism goes far beyond
> simple bug fix and is not acceptable at this stage.
>
> So let's revert this change and discuss it for post-2.6.22 timeframe.

Hi,

I am of course not a fan of limiting the maximum of available loops to 8.

My question / proposal for now would be:

Could anybody of you please be kind enough and write / provide me a counter 
patch supplying me:

a. a compilable 2.6.22-rc2 kernel
b. a loop device that can mount up to 8 iso-images

I would prefer this thing as outline attachment due to Email client 
wordwrapping problems.

Looking happily forward to a functionable counter patch to resolve the current 
issue as a compromise solution,

Best regards and thanks

Uwe

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-20 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 18:33 bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image Ray Lee
2007-05-19 19:17 ` Andrey Borzenkov
     [not found]   ` <200705200124.13026.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
2007-05-20  4:45     ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20  6:16       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  6:28         ` Al Viro
2007-05-20  6:58           ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 14:52             ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2007-05-20 15:26               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:22           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:54             ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:02               ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:23                 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-05-20 16:10               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:16                 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:29                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 19:53                     ` Michael Mauch
2007-05-21 16:11                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 16:27                     ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:35                       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 16:37                       ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:50                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 17:11                           ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-21 17:51                             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-21 17:04                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 20:48                         ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 21:20                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 22:04                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22  0:10                     ` Al Viro
2007-05-22  0:13                       ` Al Viro
2007-05-20 16:09             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:14               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 20:18           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-22 21:35             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21  6:08         ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21  6:40           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21  7:59             ` Uwe Bugla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-19 13:53 Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705201652.00503.uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox