From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2o: fix notifiers when max_drivers is configured
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:58:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521165821.GA4077@APFDCB5C> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070520211659.91c84574.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:16:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > @@ -340,8 +341,7 @@ int __init i2o_driver_init(void)
> > spin_lock_init(&i2o_drivers_lock);
> >
> > if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64) ||
> > - ((i2o_max_drivers ^ (i2o_max_drivers - 1)) !=
> > - (2 * i2o_max_drivers - 1))) {
> > + !is_power_of_2(i2o_max_drivers)) {
> > osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64 and "
> > "a power of 2\n", i2o_max_drivers);
> > i2o_max_drivers = I2O_MAX_DRIVERS;
>
> Is there any particular reason why i2o_max_drivers must be a power of two?
> It seems a peculiar constraint.
I can't find the reason.
Subject: [patch -mm] i2o: eliminate a peculiar constraint on i2o_max_drivers
There is no reason i2o_max_drivers must be a power of two.
This patch eliminates such a constraint.
Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
---
drivers/message/i2o/driver.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6-mm/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6-mm.orig/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
+++ 2.6-mm/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/log2.h>
#include "core.h"
#define OSM_NAME "i2o"
@@ -340,10 +339,9 @@ int __init i2o_driver_init(void)
spin_lock_init(&i2o_drivers_lock);
- if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64) ||
- !is_power_of_2(i2o_max_drivers)) {
- osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64 and "
- "a power of 2\n", i2o_max_drivers);
+ if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64)) {
+ osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64\n",
+ i2o_max_drivers);
i2o_max_drivers = I2O_MAX_DRIVERS;
}
osm_info("max drivers = %d\n", i2o_max_drivers);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-20 14:27 [PATCH] i2o: fix notifiers when max_drivers is configured Akinobu Mita
2007-05-21 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-21 16:58 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070521165821.GA4077@APFDCB5C \
--to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox