public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: "Ken Chen" <kenchen@google.com>
Cc: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	"Andrey Borzenkov" <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
	"Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:50:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705211851.00187.uwe.bugla@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b040c32a0705210937x3d1b8ac6wb9c8089337f5c683@mail.gmail.com>

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> wrote:
> > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when
> > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with
> > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop".  However, there is a
> > bug in that commit when loop.c was compiled as a module.  And when Al
> > fixed it, he also removed that magic "n+1" trick.
> >
> > Nevertheless, yes, I'm guilty of introducing the new behavior.
>
> The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device
> up front at module load time.  However, that will lose all the "fancy
> on-demand device instantiation feature".
>
> So I propose we do the following:
>
> 1. have the module honor "max_loop" parameter and create that many
> device upfront on module load (max_loop will also be a hard max) iff
> user specify the parameter.
> 2. if max_loop is not specified, default create 8 loop device.  User
> can extent more loop device by create device node themselves and have
> kernel automatically instantiate loop device on-demand.

Sorry, Ken:
My question on point 2 would be: Does "User can extent more loop device by 
create device node themselves and......." correspond or conflict to working 
with udev?

>
> Is this acceptable?  Patch in a bit.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 18:33 bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image Ray Lee
2007-05-19 19:17 ` Andrey Borzenkov
     [not found]   ` <200705200124.13026.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
2007-05-20  4:45     ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20  6:16       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  6:28         ` Al Viro
2007-05-20  6:58           ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 14:52             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 15:26               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:22           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:54             ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:02               ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:23                 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-05-20 16:10               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:16                 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:29                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 19:53                     ` Michael Mauch
2007-05-21 16:11                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 16:27                     ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:35                       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 16:37                       ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:50                         ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2007-05-21 17:11                           ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-21 17:51                             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-21 17:04                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 20:48                         ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 21:20                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 22:04                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22  0:10                     ` Al Viro
2007-05-22  0:13                       ` Al Viro
2007-05-20 16:09             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:14               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 20:18           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-22 21:35             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21  6:08         ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21  6:40           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21  7:59             ` Uwe Bugla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-19 13:53 Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705211851.00187.uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox