From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1761892AbXEUWj3@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1761892AbXEUWj3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 18:39:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755133AbXEUWjW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 18:39:22 -0400
Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:40724 "EHLO
	sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755019AbXEUWjV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 18:39:21 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:35:17 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>, stable@kernel.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
       Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review
Message-ID: <20070521223517.GR3429@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
References: <20070521191612.800400000@sous-sol.org> <20070521123148.a3dad5f2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070521222004.GT6291@stusta.de> <46521BFD.7040703@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46521BFD.7040703@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Chuck Ebbert (cebbert@redhat.com) wrote:
> Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...

Yes, the queue's there, just not ready to go yet.  There's still bits that were 
for sent for to .21 and are applicable to .20 (which I'm wading through ATM).

thanks,
-chris