From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:51:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070522195135.GG12157@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070522193538.GA885@kroah.com>
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:35:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:04:08PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > What's wrong with the current sysfs way of adding new device ids without
> > > touching the kernel? Devices described above was the very reason we
> > > added that functionality, so users would not have to constantly update
> > > their kernel. The distros provide userspace tools that enable these ids
> > > to be added and at boot time, everything "just works" properly.
> >
> > I haven't found a single distro that (a) makes it trivial to add PCI IDs at
> > install time, and then (b) ensures those PCI IDs remain persistent for each
> > boot. We are not at all to the "just works" stage yet.
>
> Well, SuSE handles this just fine, but I do notice that RHEL 5 disables
> the new_id stuff entirely, so I can see why you might get this
> impression :)
That's news to me. I didn't even realise it was possible to disable this.
Pointer?
> I'm just trying to point out that the new_id sysfs stuff is there
> explicitly for this very reason, as people were demanding that (Dell
> being the major company behind it.)
Theres more to this than just PCI IDs though.
ac97 ID updates, usb id updates, etc, etc.
We have many different forms of what are fundamentally, the same thing.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 18:14 [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-22 18:47 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 18:53 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-22 19:36 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 19:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-22 19:35 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 19:51 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-05-22 22:17 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 22:56 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-23 0:06 ` Greg KH
2007-05-24 1:20 ` David Hollis
2007-05-24 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-22 20:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-22 22:15 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 22:00 ` Chris Wright
2007-05-22 22:19 ` Greg KH
2007-05-22 22:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 0:25 ` Chris Wright
2007-05-24 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-24 10:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-25 6:46 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070522195135.GG12157@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox