From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rdunlap@xenotime.net
Subject: Re: RFC: Schedule EFS for removal.
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:49:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070522224900.GE22628@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070522210152.GM943@1wt.eu>
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:01:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > "Under 2.4.21, it doesnt do this."
> > >
> > > Randy mentioned in bugzilla that 2.4.22 didn't work either, so I'd
> > > be very surprised if 2.4.21 works.
> >
> > good point. I don't see anything obvious in 2.4.22 that would have
> > caused a regression, so this sounds suspect.
> > I'll close the bugzilla out based on your comments, thanks for looking at it.
>
> In my experience, often when people speak about 2.4.21 (which is quite old),
> they in fact refer to an RHEL3 kernel, which has a "few" addon patches :-)
> While I don't think that anything related to EFS might be changed in RHEL,
> may it be possible that it works as a side effect of a patch in this
> kernel ?
>
> That's just pure guess anyway.
not unless it's a recompiled version. As shipped, RHEL3 has..
# CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 14:46 RFC: Schedule EFS for removal Dave Jones
2007-05-21 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 15:09 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-21 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 15:20 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-21 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 17:11 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-21 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 17:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-22 21:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-05-22 22:49 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070522224900.GE22628@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox