From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] muptiple bugs in PI futexes
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070523072609.GC6859@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070507144351.GA12302@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
* Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 1. New entries can be added to tsk->pi_state_list after task completed
> exit_pi_state_list(). The result is memory leakage and deadlocks.
>
> 2. handle_mm_fault() is called under spinlock. The result is obvious.
>
> 3. State machine is broken. Kernel thinks it owns futex after
> it released all the locks. Ergo, it corrupts futex. The result is that
> two processes think they took a futex.
>
> All the bugs are trivially reproduced when running glibc's tst-robustpi7
> test long enough.
>
> The patch is not quite good (RFC!), because:
>
> 1. There is one case, when I did not figure out how to handle
> page fault correctly. I would do it releasing taken rtmutex
> and hb->lock and retrying futex from the very beginning.
> It is quite ugly. Probably, state machine can be fixed somehow.
>
> 2. Before this patch I had one unexplained oops inside rtmutex
> in plist_del. I did _not_ fix this, but it does not want to reproduce.
> Probably, more strong locking did some race window too narrow.
thanks for the fixes - they look all good and we'll check it in -rt.
We'll try to find a solution for the remaining problem too. Could your
#2 crash be explained via any of the bugs you fixed? (i.e. memory
corruption?) I'd exclude genuine rtmutex.c breakage for now because
that's the basis of all locking in -rt - but maybe the futex interfacing
upsets something ...
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-07 14:43 [RFC][PATCH] muptiple bugs in PI futexes Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-05-23 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-05-23 11:51 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-06-05 16:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 17:39 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-06-05 18:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 19:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 21:00 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-06-05 21:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070523072609.GC6859@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox