From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
Cc: Michael Gerdau <mgd@technosis.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@debianpt.org>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 01:21:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070523082112.GE4442@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179907115.7699.271.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04>
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:58:35AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:23 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > For me the huge difference you have for sd to the others increases the
> > likelyhood the glxgears benchmark does not measure scheduling of graphic
> > but something else.
>
> I think some people forget that X11 has its own scheduler for graphics
> operations.
OpenGL is generally orthogonal to X11 or at least should be. But this could
vary with the implementation depending on how brain damaged the system is.
I'd expect the performance charateristics to be different depending on what
subsystem is being used.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-19 20:02 Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48 Bill Davidsen
2007-05-19 20:22 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 0:44 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-20 6:12 ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-20 6:30 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 6:59 ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-20 7:20 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 6:55 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 18:27 ` Matt Keenan
2007-05-19 20:36 ` Diego Calleja
2007-05-19 20:55 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-19 23:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-05-20 16:29 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-20 16:44 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:58 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-20 17:19 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 17:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-22 20:01 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-23 0:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 13:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 18:29 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-23 20:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 21:03 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-24 0:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-05-23 4:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-23 5:23 ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-23 7:58 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-05-23 8:21 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2007-05-23 18:22 ` Ian Romanick
2007-05-23 18:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-05-23 17:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 16:59 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-22 17:22 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070523082112.GE4442@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=elmig@debianpt.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgd@technosis.de \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox