public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:20:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705231420.26622.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705231352450.3890@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:56 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Not for systems with PCIe...  and the platforms I've been having
> > trouble with have PCIe slots, so I'd really like mmconfig to be
> > used at least on machines with PCIe bridges.  For other machines,
> > it probably doesn't matter much.  I don't know of any regular PCI
> > devices offhand that really need extended config space.
>
> Ehh. Even for PCIe, why not use the normal accesses for the first 256
> bytes? Problem solved.

Ok, this patch also works.  We still need to enable mmconfig space for 
PCIe and extended config space, but we can continue to use type 1 
accesses for legacy PCI config space cycles to avoid decode trouble 
with mmconfig based BAR sizing.

Assuming Robert's and my patches to enable mmconfig space go in, we'd 
want a similar patch to the i386 mmconfig code.

Jesse

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c b/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
index 65d8273..5052f80 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned 
int bus,
 	}
 
 	addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
-	if (!addr)
+	if (!addr || reg < 256) /* Use type 1 for non-extended access */
 		return pci_conf1_read(seg,bus,devfn,reg,len,value);
 
 	switch (len) {
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned 
int bus,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
-	if (!addr)
+	if (!addr || reg < 256) /* Use type 1 for non-extended access */
 		return pci_conf1_write(seg,bus,devfn,reg,len,value);
 
 	switch (len) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-23 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30  2:14 [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources Robert Hancock
2007-04-30  2:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-30 22:59 ` Olivier Galibert
2007-04-30 23:26   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-01 16:48   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  2:41   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  2:56     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  5:27       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02 14:34         ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-02 17:57           ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02 23:45             ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-02 23:54               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 21:06                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-05  0:22                   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-21 19:10                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-21 19:26                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-21 20:07                       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-21 20:22                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  0:31                           ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23  0:38                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  0:53                               ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23  0:56                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  1:06                               ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 18:52                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 20:20                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 20:38                                     ` Alan Cox
2007-05-23 20:45                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 20:49                                     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 20:56                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 21:03                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:09                                           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 21:35                                             ` Alan Cox
2007-05-23 21:35                                               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 21:37                                               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:42                                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 23:07                                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-23 21:54                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:06                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 22:16                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:28                                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 23:04                                                 ` David Miller
2007-05-23 23:11                                                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 23:15                                                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:21                                                       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:20                                         ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2007-05-23 22:24                                           ` Olivier Galibert
2007-05-23 22:31                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 22:48                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:55                                               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  0:21                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  2:59                                                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  3:18                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  3:20                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  3:40                                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  5:19                                                           ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-24  6:18                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-24 15:42                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 23:04                                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:04                                   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:06                                     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  0:02 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705231420.26622.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox