From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751557AbXEXTgh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 15:36:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750801AbXEXTg3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 15:36:29 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:48671 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbXEXTg3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 15:36:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:36:21 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Jan Kara , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption Message-Id: <20070524123621.4327aca9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070524192321.GD20500@cvg> References: <20070524165935.GB19709@duck.suse.cz> <20070524172017.GA19852@cvg> <20070524113550.d09dbf9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070524192321.GD20500@cvg> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 May 2007 23:23:21 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Andrew Morton - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:35:50AM -0700] > | On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:20:17 +0400 > | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > | > | > [Jan Kara - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:59:35PM +0200] > | > | Hi Andrew, > | > | > | > | attached patch fixes possible data corruption in UDF - this bug was actually > | > | introduced by one of my fixes :-( and should (if possible) go to Linus before > | > | 2.6.22 is out (that's why I'm diffing against Linus's tree and not the > | > | latest changes in -mm tree)... Thanks. > | > | > | > | Honza > | > | > | > | -- > | > | Jan Kara > | > | SuSE CR Labs > | > > | > Jan should I wait until Andrew has your patches included and > | > only then (having taken into account your patches) produce my > | > conversion? > | > > | > | yes please - bugfixes come first. > | > > Andrew, so could I assume that these patches are in your -mm tree > to be able to work on UDF style conversion? > Sure. If something breaks, I'll fix it up. If you take the two-patch approach (first patch is Lindent, second patch is post-Lindent fixups) then it becomes easy at this end: the first patch is the big one and if it breaks, I just re-run Lindent and regenerate it.