Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[Andrew Morton - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:36:21PM -0700]
| On Thu, 24 May 2007 23:23:21 +0400
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| 
| > [Andrew Morton - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:35:50AM -0700]
| > | On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:20:17 +0400
| > | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| > | 
| > | > [Jan Kara - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:59:35PM +0200]
| > | > |   Hi Andrew,
| > | > | 
| > | > |   attached patch fixes possible data corruption in UDF - this bug was actually
| > | > | introduced by one of my fixes :-( and should (if possible) go to Linus before
| > | > | 2.6.22 is out (that's why I'm diffing against Linus's tree and not the
| > | > | latest changes in -mm tree)... Thanks.
| > | > | 
| > | > | 								Honza
| > | > | 
| > | > | -- 
| > | > | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
| > | > | SuSE CR Labs
| > | > 
| > | > Jan should I wait until Andrew has your patches included and
| > | > only then (having taken into account your patches) produce my
| > | > conversion?
| > | > 
| > | 
| > | yes please - bugfixes come first.
| > | 
| > 
| > Andrew, so could I assume that these patches are in your -mm tree
| > to be able to work on UDF style conversion?
| > 
| 
| Sure.  If something breaks, I'll fix it up.
| 
| If you take the two-patch approach (first patch is Lindent, second patch is
| post-Lindent fixups) then it becomes easy at this end: the first patch is
| the big one and if it breaks, I just re-run Lindent and regenerate it.
| 

OK

		Cyrill