Re: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers

Jesper Juhl
2007-05-24T23:27:18Z

On 25/05/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Ok, that makes sense. How about this version :
>
> Could you document which numbers were actually used by umsdos, instead
> of reserving a full block of 256? Since it's dead, it's not going to
> eat any more numbers.
>
Sure, I'll dig out that information and prepare a new patch tomorrow
(need to catch some sleep right now).

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html