From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext3-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: fs periodic check (was Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:03:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528130318.GL18807@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070528123824.GA32510@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Hi!
> > But here's what I've got:
> >
> > oot@spitz:/home/pavel# fsck.ext2 -f /dev/hda3
> > e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
> > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> > Inode 371989 has illegal block(s). Clear<y>? yes
> >
> > Illegal block #2 (134217728) in inode 371989. CLEARED.
> > Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> >
> > i_file_acl for inode 371988 (/home/root/misc/zaurus/smail) is 131072,
> > should be zero.
> > Clear<y>? yes
> >
> > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> > Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> > Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> > Block bitmap differences: -339972 +471044
> > Fix<y>? yes
> >
> > Free blocks count wrong for group #10 (13882, counted=13883).
> > Fix<y>? yes
> >
> > ...kernel 2.6.16-preempt (on zaurus). Filesystem should have been clean -- I was
> > using it till crash for half a year, but that's what journal is for,
> > right? ...But I guess this is almost impossible to debug?
> Actually, your case doesn't seem to be hard. The first block number
> is 0x8000000 and the second one 0x20000. So something is flipping your
> bits...
Hmm, ouch. Yes, that machine was pretty unstable after repeated
suspend-to-RAMs, so I guess this is a symptom of same problem. Sorry
about noise.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-28 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 9:06 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted Martin Mokrejs
2007-05-18 9:53 ` Martin Zwickel
2007-05-18 11:47 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-18 13:51 ` Martin Mokrejs
2007-05-18 14:08 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-18 14:32 ` Martin Mokrejs
2007-05-18 14:20 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-05-18 14:35 ` Martin Mokrejs
2007-05-18 21:57 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-20 19:55 ` fs periodic check (was Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted) Pavel Machek
2007-05-22 18:01 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-24 17:39 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-28 12:38 ` Jan Kara
2007-05-28 13:03 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-05-29 2:55 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-29 3:05 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-29 11:38 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-29 11:34 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070528130318.GL18807@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox