From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:06:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705281406.44340.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070528172418.GA2076@srcf.ucam.org>
On Monday 28 May 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
>
> Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the
> RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow
> wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport range, assume
> that it's on IRQ 8 unless the tables say otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> index 6085261..e24ea82 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> @@ -641,9 +641,16 @@ cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id)
> * drivers can't provide shutdown() methods to disable IRQs.
> * Or better yet, fix PNP to allow those methods...
> */
> - return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> - &pnp->res.port_resource[0],
> - pnp->res.irq_resource[0].start);
> + if (pnp_port_start(pnp,0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp,0))
> + /* Some machines contain a PNP entry for the RTC, but
> + * don't define the IRQ. It should always be safe to
> + * hardcode it in these cases
> + */
> + return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, &pnp->res.port_resource[0], 8);
> + else
> + return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> + &pnp->res.port_resource[0],
> + pnp->res.irq_resource[0].start);
> }
>
> static void __exit cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp)
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-28 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-27 19:03 RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface Matthew Garrett
2007-05-27 23:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 0:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 1:44 ` David Brownell
2007-05-28 2:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 18:50 ` Matthieu CASTET
2007-05-30 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-30 1:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 21:06 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-05-28 1:36 ` RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705281406.44340.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox