public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528143939.GA16026@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070528110944.GE32045@in.ibm.com>

* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> [2007-05-28 13:09]:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> [2007-05-01 07:06]:
> > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
> > 
> > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you
> > didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug?
> 
> I had sent a mail to gdb mailing list but no response. Did not raise
> a bug though.

BTW: Did anyone test with GDB 6.6?


Thanks,
   Bernhard

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-28 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30 15:12 [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-30 15:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01  3:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01  4:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  5:06       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01  5:26         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  6:25           ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01  5:54             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  6:44               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 10:54         ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 11:09           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 14:39             ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2007-06-01 12:26               ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 14:57           ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-31  7:53 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 - no boot, "address not 2M aligned" Andrew Morton
2007-04-01  5:29 ` thunder7
2007-04-01  6:15   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-01  6:29     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-02  7:41       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02  8:43         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-02  9:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02 17:26             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03  4:01               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-03  5:23                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03 10:03                   ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-23  5:12                     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24  6:31                       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-24  7:21                         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070528143939.GA16026@suse.de \
    --to=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox